Skip to main content

Full text of "USPTO Patents Application 10582547"

See other formats


Att'y Docket: 2029.02 



Discussion of Claim Rejections under 35 USC 101 

Claim 13 was rejected under 35 USC 101 for not being tied to a particular machine and 
not performing a transformation. 

In response, Applicant amended Claim 1 3 to tie each step to a particular processing unit 
for a specific performance of a transformation. Thus, the claim rejection should be withdrawn. 

Discussion of Claim Rejections under 35 USC 103 

Claims 1-7 and 12-26 were rejected under 35 USC 103(a) as being unpatentable over 
Guenebaud (US Pub. No. 2006/0053457) in view of Kudumakis (US Pub. No. 2003/0128845). 

In response, Applicant amended Claims 1,13 and 21 and respectfully disagrees with the 
Examiner. 
Claim 1 

The amended Claim 1 provides that 

A distorted contents generating apparatus comprising: 

an initial value generation unit for generating an initial 
value used to generate a random number for a distorting 
filter; 

a random number generation unit for generating a random 
number for the distorting based on the initial value 
transmitted from the initial value generation unit; 

a filter generation unit for generating a distorting filter 
based on the initial value and the random number; 

a data filtering unit for distorting an- original contents 
into distorted contents by filtering the original contents 
with the distorting filter; 



2029.02\OA\2029,02-OAResponse 



Att'y Docket: 2029.02 

an encoding unit for encoding the distorted contents output 
from the data filtering unit; 

a signal insertion unit for encrypting the initial value 
information generated by the initial value generation unit and 
inserting the encrypted filter initial value into the 
distorted contents; and 

an image correction unit for inserting image correction 
information into the encoded distorted contents transmitted 
from the encoding unit. 

Fig. 9 




Omm IMAGE 0ISTORTE.D IMAGE 

Fig. 9 of the present invention 



The present invention provides an apparatus for protecting copyrighted original image or 
contents. Background art of the specification describes downsides of traditional copyright 



2029.02\OA\2029.02-OAResponse 



Att'y Docket: 2029.02 

protection techniques including a DRM (Digital Right Management) and this invention overcame 
such downsides by providing a means to distort original image into distorted one, transmit the 
distorted image and then restore the original image. Thus, the present invention comprises four 
major elements: a distorting filter, encoding unit, decoding unit and contents recovering unit. 
Neither Guenebaud, Kudumakis, nor combination thereof teaches or discloses the claimed 
invention. 

First, Guenenbaud provides a digital signal-processing module for encoding and decoding 
digital signals. Even if Guenenbaud mentioned "filtering unit," it does not disclose "distorting 
filter" to distort original image or contents. To the contrary, it is obvious from the context that 
Guenebaud' s filtering does not involve the processing of "distorting." In addition, Guenebaud' s 
filtering does not use the initial value and the random number as in the claimed invention. 

Second, due to lack of distorting processing, Guenenbaud does not have the image 
correction unit of the present invention. The Examiner mentioned Guenebaud' s inserting image 
date in paragraph 0112 corresponds to the image correction unit, but Guenebaud' s inserting 
image is to process two streams (or more) of digital data simultaneously, not to insert image 
correction information into the encoded distorted contents. Guenebaud's inserting image 
supports that Guenebaud does not involve the processing of distorting images. 

The combination of elements as claimed is not taught or suggested by the references 
alone or in combination. Furthermore, one of ordinary skill in that art, would not look to either 
Guenebaud or Kudumakis to achieve the advantages of the present invention. Combining 
Guenebaud and Kudumakis does not in any way teach or suggest the claimed invention. 

Therefore, Applicant respectfully submits Claim 1 is now patentable. 



2029.02\OA\2029.02-OAResponse 



Att'y Docket: 2029.02 




Claim 6 

Claim 6 depends on now patentable Claim 1 with additional limitations of "an initial 
value encrypting unit for encrypting the initial value information generated by the initial value 
generation unit. Again, neither Guenebaud nor Kudumakis discloses this kind of unit. 
Encrypting initial value 

Therefore, Applicant respectfully submits Claim 6 is now patentable. 

Other claims 

Claims 2-12 depend on now patentable Claim 1 and thus, Applicant respectfully submits 
Claims 2-12 are now patentable. 

Method Claims 13-26 include the limitations of Claim 1 and thus, the arguments for 
Claim 1 above apply to these claims as well. Therefore, Applicant respectfully submits Claims 
13-26 are now patentable. 



2029.02\OA\2029.02-OAResponse 



Att'y Docket: 2029.02 



CONCLUSION 

The applicant now believes that the rejections are obviated by this amendment, and the 
application is now in condition for allowance: therefore, reexamination, reconsideration and 
allowance of the claims are respectfully requested. If there are any additional comments or 
requirements from the examination, the applicant asks for a non-final office action. 



Very truly yours, 
Park Law Firm 



4/T. 2010 Bv: -^j^^CS 



By:_ 

Choongseop 1 Lee, Ph.D. 
Regis. No. 57,051 



3255 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1110 
Los Angeles, California 90010 
Tel: (213) 389-3777 



2029.02\OA\2029.02-OAResponse